1/28/2012 — Skeptical about what I call “HAARP rings”?

Posted on January 28, 2012 by

Here is just the TIP of the iceberg on the forecast confirmations of what I have named “HAARP rings” (could be called frequency spikes).

————————————————–

 

I recommend that you start by watching this video from Spring 2011 — mashup of just one of my HAARP ring forecasts with the actual events:

or watch this:

or watch this:

or watch these:

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nebraska+hwy+tornado+dutchsinse&oq=nebraska+hwy+tornado+dutchsinse&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=13129l25177l0l25393l42l42l2l29l3l0l210l1638l0.10.1l11l0

or watch this:

or watch these:

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=washington+state+tornadoes+dutchsinse&oq=washington+state+tornadoes+dutchsinse&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=21622l27919l0l28147l37l32l0l20l20l0l211l1672l4.6.2l12l0

or watch this:

or watch this:

or watch this:

or watch this:

or watch this:

or watch this:

thats just to start you off if youre a skeptic… there is MUCH more when you’re done w/ the above examples

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to 1/28/2012 — Skeptical about what I call “HAARP rings”?

  1. Mark Tandy (@MarkTandy1) says:
    January 28, 2012 at 2:12 pm

    Perhaps your work may gain wider recognicion if you were less insistent on using the term “harp rings”. Unless you can provide undisputed and widely accepted evidence of the phenomena you cover being caused by the HAARP facilities all you are doing is shifting attention from the real cause.

    I’m sure you are aware of the increasing effect space weather has on earth’s atmospheric patterns – you should not stubbornly hang on to the term HAARP rings just because you coined the term.

    • sincedutch says:
      January 28, 2012 at 3:57 pm

      I think i’ve done that… tiltable AIM.. ground based heaters.. all work in conjunction with master control… and HAARP more applies to a technology not the actual place in alaska..

      either that or its an accident by nexrad switching from one mode to another.. if that turns out to be the case.. I’ll drop “haarp” and change it to “frequency”.. but HAARP is a good way to sum up the effect of a ground based station using magnetism, VLF, and UHF to cause a weather outcome.

  4. Pingback: 1/28/2012 — Further dissection of the ‘HAARP ring’ theory / ‘Frequency manipulation’ of the weather | ＤＵＴＣＨＳＩＮＳＥ = ＳＩＮＣＥＤＵＴＣＨ

  5. peggy gannon (@first_islander) says:
    January 28, 2012 at 4:13 pm

    I’m new to all this and trying to understand the mechanics. Are you maintaining that there are facilities/installations/locations all over the country that regularly use technology to influence weather? To what purpose? Especially in light of the severe weather aftermath that you associate with this supposed activity. What do you claim they are trying to do?

  6. Pingback: Further dissection of the ‘HAARP ring’ theory / ‘Frequency manipulation’ of the weather | OzHouse Alt News

  7. Sierra Tango says:
    January 28, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    I have never been skeptical about your work. I confirmed all of your predictions after the fact, so already knew that your predictions were 100% accurate. Because of this, I trust your predictions NOW. Anyone who questions you should simply do the follow-up, as I did. Because the government has patents on file for various components of HAARP, I already knew about HAARP and of its main facility at the University of Alaska/Fairbanks. To the few remaining skeptics (if any): you can confirm HAARP’s role in space weather anomalies yourselves. Simply check out HAARP’s activity on the HAARP site at University of Alaska!

Comments are closed.